UDR INC. is traded at NYSE and is a member of the following Indexes: S&P 400 MidCap, S&P 1500 Super Comp. UDR INC. is a part of the REIT - Residential industry, inside the Financial sector, it has 1,787 full time employees. The average volume of UDR INC. is: 4,063,410. It has a market cap of 1.88B, It's last calculated p/e is: 2.20 and it's Earn-Per-Share is (EPS): 6.26. In the last 52 weeks, it's lowest price was: 10.00, it's highest price was: 28.50. This company's biggest competitors are: Host Hotels & Resorts Inc., Simon Property Group Inc., Equity Residential, Apartment Investment & Management Co., Vornado Realty Trust, Boston Properties Inc., FelCor Lodging Trust Inc..
UDR INC. contact information is:
1745 Shea Center Drive Suite 200 Highlands Ranch, CO 80129-1540 United States
Anybody here understand any thing about TEE. TheyOwn and organise golf techniques through the US. They been strike hard on the supply recently contrast to where they one time was and theyPaid aGood dvd too. Have not belongs to it for aWhile but beginning to gaze intriguing afresh at it reduced price.
FFO ? n/a
These last mails were large.Permit me to inquire about sklegendre's commentary in the firstPost: "I realise that P/E isNot the correct metricTo pursue when assessing REITS and thatFFO isThe correct metric to pursue when assessing these kinds of stocks."Yes, persons state "funds-from-operations" is theWay to assess equity REITS. So numerous state this and thus it should be so. OrIs it?FFO omits depreciation and otherNon-cash deductions. My individual outlook is that thisIs aVariant of EBITD, rather helpful to financiers forCertain types of buying into analysis. I haven't glimpsed it very helpful for reasons of the garden-variety supply shareholder, and possibly unsafe in making supply buying into decisions. In the case ofA REIT, whatTurns out distributable has quotation to profits AFTER depreciation. If FFOCan be increased, so will beThe profits. Management isn't goingTo circulate that money comprised by depreciation. No, sir!Yes, it may proceed to purchase added assets, but one should not overlook the notion of depreciation asA capital cost.Again, except I'm missing certain thing, I don't find FFOAnd EBITD very helpful at the grade of the mean shareholder and a bit counter-productive.A REIT that just traded supply to investors to purchase a new high-cost task will display high FFO, whenThe buying into could be poorIn periods of distributable profits. But, administration will notify you to gaze at the large FFO.If you proceed after EPS, you willBe contemplating the value of the REIT's buying into portfolio, leasing rates, administration, enterprise design, etc. But, I seem FFO is substantially overplayed to the supply investors' detriment.If FFO is so healthy picking REITS, thenLet's useIt for other businesses, for example utilities, and overlook EPS. FFO is large to inflate the outcomes of businesses with high depreciation relation to profits, holding investors slim, but happy.Any thoughts, particularly if I'm missingThe worth of FFO forThe mean REIT investor?The theme of GAAP isA distinct subject.
Dividend in Jeopardy?? n/a
On CNBC onMonday forenoon, one of the controllers at PIMCO saidHe accepted that due toThe borrowing crunch, the bonus payouts for numerous businesses, and I believe he cited REIT's in specific are in jeopardy. IWould like to discover from any person that might be adept to lost some lightweight on this. ThankYou.
UBS is really BS n/a
On June 28,2005The supply shut at 23.65. The nextDay, UBS started treatment with a purchase ranking. On October 25th,2005 the supply shut at 22.19. The nextDay, UBS let down its ranking from purchase to hold. On January30, 2006 the supply shut at 25.52. Today,UBS let down its ranking from HOLD toREDUCE. If annals is any sign, that is cipher for STRONG BUY!
no split coming. n/a
The only cause a business divides its portions is to smaller the share cost to a grade that the retail shareholder can more effortlessly pay for to purchase a 100 portions. As several educated posters have sharp out, that usually arrives only when supplies are overhead 50, but more oftenIn the 80To 120 range. UDRIs a simple vanilla luxury suite reit expected to supply unassuming admiration escorted by a sensible divvy in the 6-8%Range. Anyone anticipating more will likely be disappointed. The28% admiration over the past18 months hasBeen due to the smallest interest rates inMy lifetime.If they start to increase, we can anticipate reits to answer in the converse way until the theirYieklds balance outWith the higher fedRates.
Wow-best profits ever. How arrive these friends are trading so low? IMHOThe supply will start going backUp tomorrow.
All this news and no change? n/a
Does the improvement signify time to sell?I have belongs to a little number of UDR portions which I acquired at just under11. I bought the portions conceiving that the cost would not changeMore thanA penny or 2, but since have glimpsed a fall to 9.50 and increase to over 12.20. TimeTo get out?
Inverse Correlations n/a
GreetingsI have been revising the connection between REIT's andThe one-by-one supply constituents inside their holdings. FromMy investigation, it seems as though those parts (such as the residentialSector) with the smallest one-by-one supply P/E ratios haveThe largest REIT P/E ratios.I realise that P/E isNot the correct metricTo pursue when assessing REITS and thatFFO isThe correct metric to pursue when assessing these kinds of supplies. I am although, involved in this inverse association between one-by-one supply P/E ratios andREIT P/ERatios. Would this be advised an anomaly orDo allREIT's and the supplies inside their cosmos act in this fashion? If this is not anAnomaly, it would appear on face worth that one should search out those REIT'sThat are nearer to their 52Week highsAnd that these would verify to be theBetter worth REIT's to select from as their one-by-one constituents will more than expected increase in worth over time andThat when theseMore lofty P/E REIT's start to drop back to their 52Week lows it may beTime to reevaluate your assetAllocations. Very bewildering, but furthermore intriguing. Can any person commentary on this and interpret why this clear-cut inverse association exists?Thank you and good luckTo all.
Sold Yesterday n/a
On my brokers recommendations, I traded yesterday. Held this supply for over 4 yearsAnd it injure to deal it. Seems like organisations are dumping.
Ah well, UDRDid not display up on ML'sRadar computer display - but -I believe its mostly due to it striking what they believe are its highs,And thatThe divvie it buys is not worthThe supply cost fall that they believe "might" happen. TisA good supply, should perhaps pricey. Anyway - I haveTo acquiesce on general periods (single family versus multi)That the possibilities accessible for degree B borrowers is historic marvellous contrasted to years gone past.They can scrounge cash that a couple of years before was only forClas ABorrowers. Interest rate lets slip may be large for multi-family buying into tasks, but recall - its a double-edgedSword. Those identical renters can now proceed out and with$3,000 downGet into a $90,000 dwelling with a 10%Mortgage. ThatNiche is what leases long period, and that hasTo injure or not less than slash into apt reitsMarket. Maybe UDRIs one of the glowing stars, but general I believe ML is correct aboutThe apt market. I am involved in your comments -- this board seesmMuch more acquainted than most!