(AWR) AMER ST WATER Reviews

Question n/a

Can any person supply data on why this supply appears to have important moves up andDown periodically?Is it just dueTo reduced capacity of portions traded?seems to be muchMore common than ever before.Thanks,

At first blush n/a

earnings gaze attractive good. I realise there is aConf callFor 10:00 west seaboard area time. If somebody listens I would certain realise your comments. Regards.

Anyone have any information on this? n/a

12:23PM Amer StatesWater hold ups 10-K filing (AWR)Co reveals in today's Form NT10-K that the elongation is to permit the co to consider the influence on its economic declarations and revelations producing from a conclusion arranged to be offered before the CaliforniaPublic Utilities CommissionOn March 16, theDay directly following the designated day for which theCo's Form10-K filing is else due.

AWR==tomms ENRON n/a

Water businesses are watered stock.Trust me, no one likes to pay for water.Enron was problem in my brain when they begun buying water businesses in the late90s--I knewIt was only a issue of time beforeThey fell.Look at California's power market and the'fiasco' that occurred by the businesses fundamentally playing by the directions granted to them. DoYou frankly believe AWR will be permitted to ascribe market rates forH20? I believe AWR is overvaluedHere.

Claremont Deal n/a

Claremont is certain thing like 5% ofThe AWRBusiness. If the town really went the disapproval path, it will takeYears. What drives California towns to desire to own water businesses is the detail that it is oneOf the couple of ways they haveTo lift incomes without going toThe voters. TheOnly constraint is a lawful one mandating thatThe water cost should contemplate its cost. CityAccountants then playWith the cost structure. The supreme disapproval cost by court conclusion will end upBeing two times what the town thinks. Might be healthy AWR. But itWill take aLong time, and AWRWill assault the cash.This deal examines like the unseeing premier the deaf.

More water going solar power n/a

Yet more waterGoing solar power:http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/storie...June 09, 2006 Solar power task christened at LasVegas reservoir location ASSOCIATED PRESS LAS VEGAS (AP) - TheSun blazed and electric gear hummed as waterUtility agents and an power business assessed the culmination of the firstOf 6 solar power installations designed in the south Nevada area.Check the world wide web sheet underneath for a couple of connections about water remedy plants going solar.And allotments of connections about ESLR, Evergreen Solar,Who is a manufacturer of solar modules.------Visit:www.geocities<dot>com/delbertdg2/VerticalSolar.htmlto discover more about Evergreen SolarInc (ticker: ESLR),countries expanding their use ofRenewable power,and alterations in the environment.(lots of info soBe persevering while it loads)(replace "<dot>" with ".")Bye

News artilce re. Chino Hills.... n/a

...published in today's (8thMay '01) editon ofThe Daily Bulletin -Another 'failed' try per award/merge appears imminent - Chino Hills CityCouncil to ballot this night falling AWR's lease suggestion - 30 yrs.@ $1Mil. per. yr.. malfunction with Westminster in'98, and DOMZIn '99 one sucessful accolade per country AZ accolade in '00 - tendency is distracting if only becauseW.o. a important % of assets inNon-PUC the futureOf AWR is sluggishAt best particularly per the broadcast $18 mil. in electric allegations they're giving and the pending demand to PUC in allowing reimbursement of theseCosts. Sadly founded on CA-AWK's conclusion in March to down turn to 'merge' w. SJWThe prospects ofA suitor to approachAWR is very unlikely and that means farther reducing of income assets with whichTo function day-to-day esp. withNo clear principle re. electrical energy costs. If any thing AWR's present economic 'state' is farther impacted as those possibly captivated to their assets(pipes, wells, remedy plants, etc). willNow delay to glimpse how much lower they can be 'bought'And that might beNext year. BTW (asUsual) that conclusion by AWR's mgmt. in'98 to inplant their'poison pill' to deflectA takeover assists only AWR's mgmt.Not shareholder's http://www.dailybulletin.com/news/articl...C.H. assembly considers finish water talksPublished Tuesday, May 8, 200112:00:00 AM -----------------------------------------------By Sharon NagyStaff WriterCHINO HILLS -- A suggestion to end moreThan 2 years of agreement discussions with Southern CaliforniaWater Co. supportive extending to sustain a city-operated water scheme individually is arranged to be advised this night by the CityCouncil. City agents state they are apprehensive aboutPrivatization because they accept as true it could convey a smaller benchmark of scheme maintenance.City Councilman Gary Larson,Who investigated the topic and suggested self-reliance, said Southern California WaterCo. has suggested to pay $1Million every year for 30 yearsTo conquer the scheme. "Yeah, we need the money;We could decisively use it," LarsonSaid. "ButIn the long, overhaul image, if we were toLease out the scheme 15 or 30 years,And get the scheme back in a worsened status, it would costUs many more to getIt backTo where it was."Water business agents contradicted, saying the suggested pact double-checked that the scheme would be correctly maintained. "We're let down the agreement isn't going to proceed through," said Joel Dickson,The company's vice leader of enterprise development. "We were eager to signal a agreement to hold up the scheme. We were hopeful we could offerThem millionsOf dollars of added value. It was aWin-win situation."

Bad news for CWT means same.... n/a

...for AWR - http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/011206/60317_1.h...CWT stands to be refuted almost $6 mil. inPower charges - I appear to recall AWRHad inquired for an even bigger allowance than CWT wasJust refuted per this press issue - wasn't AWR's$ allowance somewhere in the$9 mil.+ variety - not good.

What s up? n/a

Anyone understand why we areUp nearly 45-50% since Feb? ILike it but actually no report out there to propose a high price.Thanks.

Why should I own this stock when.... n/a

compared to other businesses it's yield, bonus development rate are subPar and liability grades very high. UST and MO both offerBetter yields and development prospects. TECO power has a better yield.KMP a much better yield.While these are notWater supplies, they are approximately in the identical risk class when looking atTheir betas. It appear like the risk come back trade-offs for AWRJust don't contain water. What amI missing?